POWER AND STRUGGLE |
||
![]() |
The Politics of Nonviolent Action by Gene Sharp was published in 1973.
Power and Struggle, the first of three volumes, focuses on the nature of power. |
![]() |
THE NATURE OF POWER |
|||
Sharp's view of power is based on an simple but important fact: |
|||
Rulers derive their power from those over whom they rule. |
|||
The technique of strategic nonviolence is based on this insight. |
|||
WHY PEOPLE OBEY |
||||||||
Domination and submission are psychological states of mind. |
Withdrawing support, even symbolically, calls into question the props and illusions that hold Power up. |
|||||||
VIOLENT SANCTIONS |
||||||
Most rulers have massive amounts of force at their disposal. |
||||||
But violence is not always effective against nonviolent groups that are united, determined, dedicated to their cause and willing to act strategically: |
||||||
Sanctions must be carried out by the ruler's agents (police or military personnel) who may or may not obey (or may drag their feet and only make a show of obeying). |
||||||
A ruler's agents may become reluctant when ordered to commit especially brutal acts against people who are clearly presenting no physical threat. |
||||||
Agents may begin to sympathize with the opposition's cause. |
||||||
Also, too much brutality can create martyrs and increase support for the opposition group among groups that were previously neutral in the struggle. |
||||||
It is impossible to physically force a person to obey. |
||||||
As Sharp
puts it: "It is not the sanctions themselves which produce obedience,
but the fear of them." |
||||||
VICTORY |
||||
Sharp cites three ways that nonviolent actionists can prevail: |
||||
|
Conversion |
||||
|
Accommodation |
||||
|
Nonviolent coercion
|
||||
Even when a nonviolent campaign is unable to change its adversary's way of thinking, it can still influence its adversary's actions. |
||||
THE FUTURE |
|||||
Since The Politics of Nonviolent Action was published public awareness of nonviolence as a legitimate and effective form of struggle has blossomed. |
|||||
The technique has been used successfully in numerous high visibility conflicts such as the ousting of Marcos in the Philippines (1986) and the prevention of a military coup in Russia (1991). |
|||||
Perhaps
we are finally realizing that using violent methods against those in
power—who are violence specialists—is not always the best
strategy. |
|||||